Skip to content
Back to Blog

From 36% to 86% ATS Match: A Real Resume, Fixed

4 min read
We took a real mid-career resume from a 36% ATS match to 86% in under 30 minutes. Clear steps, before→after bullets, and a reusable checklist.

See exactly how a real, anonymized resume went from an ATS match of 36% → 86% using edits you can repeat today.

👉 Get started: ATS Resume Checker · Resume Keywords · Keywords Finder
📌 Helpful: run the Keywords Finder first, then scan the edited file in the ATS Checker.


New here? Start with: Mastering ATS Optimization

Case summary (quick reads)

  • Profile: Sales Manager — SaaS (Senior), mid-career, 2-page resume
  • Start: 36% ATS match — missing core skills, vague outcomes, icon-only contact info
  • Finish: 86% ATS match — clean headings, measurable bullets, vendor names included
  • Time spent: ~28 minutes (single pass)
  • Export: PDF, single column, selectable text, embedded fonts

Step 1 — establish the baseline

We scanned the original PDF against a SaaS Sales Manager JD with the ATS Checker.

Flags:

  • Missing core concepts: Pipeline Management, Forecast Accuracy, Renewals, MEDDIC
  • Missing tools: Salesforce, Gong, LinkedIn Sales Navigator
  • Sparse outcomes: few numbers for win rate, ACV/ARR, renewal rate
  • Structure risks: contact info as icons, decorative bullets, mixed columns

Baseline: 36% match; multiple parsing risks.


Step 2 — fix structure so it parses cleanly

Changes:

  1. Single-column layout; consistent headings (Summary, Experience, Education, Skills)
  2. Icons → plain text for email, phone, LinkedIn
  3. Standard list bullets (no custom glyphs)
  4. Remove tables used for layout
  5. Ensure PDF text is selectable; embed fonts

Why: parsers read text order and headings. Clean structure prevents dropped sections and jumbled content.


Step 3 — add role-specific skills and tools (naturally)

  • Generated a seed list in Keywords Finder: “Sales Manager — SaaS, Senior”
  • Wove 15–20 relevant terms into Summary, Skills, and experience bullets

Examples used:

  • Core: Pipeline Management, Forecast Accuracy, MEDDIC, Territory Planning, Renewal & Expansion
  • Tools: Salesforce, Gong, SalesLoft, LinkedIn Sales Navigator
  • Outcomes: Win Rate, ACV/ARR, Churn, Renewal Rate

Tip: include vendor + generic at least once: “Salesforce CRM (CRM)”.


Step 4 — replace generic claims with measured outcomes

Before → After

  • Before: “Responsible for sales pipeline and closing deals.”
    After: “Expanded ACV by +28% YoY; raised win rate from 21%→29% by standardizing MEDDIC in Salesforce and weekly deal reviews.”

  • Before: “Managed team and accounts.”
    After: “Led 7 AEs; introduced stage definitions and forecast hygiene, improving forecast accuracy from 62%→86%.”

  • Before: “Handled renewals.”
    After: “Lifted renewal rate from 84%→91% via early-warning playbooks from Gong insights and QBR action plans.”

Keep numbers truthful. If exacts aren’t shareable, use ranges (e.g., “~20–25%”).


Step 5 — align the heading and target

  • Title the summary with the actual target role: “Senior Sales Manager (SaaS)”
  • Add a one-line value statement: “SaaS new logo + expansion; forecast accuracy and win-rate lift.”

This clarifies intent for recruiters and scoring systems.


Step 6 — export cleanly

  • PDF, single column, embedded fonts
  • Sanity check: select all → copy → paste into a text editor. Order should be sensible; headings intact.

Re-scan results

Re-scan the revised PDF against the same JD:

  • Match score: 36% → 86%
  • Core concepts: most high-weight terms covered
  • Tools: Salesforce, Gong, SalesLoft, LinkedIn Sales Navigator matched
  • Outcomes: win rate, ACV/ARR, renewal rate, forecast accuracy present

Results vary by posting, but this method reliably improves parsing and relevance.


Repeatable checklist (copy this)

  1. Single-column layout; real text for headings + contact info
  2. Add 15–20 relevant keywords (core, tools, outcomes) naturally
  3. Replace generic bullets with measurable results
  4. Include vendor + generic naming once (e.g., “Salesforce CRM (CRM)”)
  5. Export to PDF with embedded fonts; verify text is selectable
  6. Scan with ATS Checker; close gaps and rescan

Quick start

  1. Open Keywords Finder → generate role-specific terms
  2. Blend the relevant items into Summary, Skills, and bullets
  3. Export a clean PDF → run ATS Checker against the JD
  4. Patch missing terms → rescan → apply

FAQ

How many keywords should I add?
Aim for 15–20 across Summary, Skills, and experience bullets. Keep it natural.

PDF or Word?
PDF is typically fine when it’s single-column with selectable text and embedded fonts.

Will this pass every ATS?
No universal guarantees. The structure + relevance approach improves your odds across systems.


FAQ

How many keywords should I add?

Aim for 15–20 relevant items across Summary, Skills, and experience bullets. Keep phrasing natural—avoid stuffing.

PDF or Word for ATS?

PDF is usually fine if it’s single-column, text-only headings, and embedded fonts. Always ensure the text is selectable.

Will this work for every posting?

No one can promise that. But the structure + relevance approach consistently improves parsing and match quality.

Do I need industry-specific terms?

Yes. Mirror the employer’s language. Use the Keywords Finder to gather role/industry terms, then weave them in naturally.

How can I reproduce this test?

Export a clean PDF, scan with the ATS Checker against the same JD, adjust the gaps, and rescan. Follow the checklist below.

Related posts

Ready to Get Hired Faster?

See how your resume stacks up against the job. Get a free, instant AI analysis and a clear rewrite that improves your match before you pay a cent.

No payment required to try

ATS-Friendly
Optimized for standard parsers
Free to Start
Try core features first
7-Day Refund
Full refund for subscriptions. Fix My CV export guaranteed or we’ll fix it.
Stripe Secure
We never store your card